Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a small group...?
_____________________ Fabian Boulegue tea inc. CEO - Founder Meierbrede 9 33100 Paderborn Mobile Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <[email protected]>: > The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various committers in > transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow. > > On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on Monday? >> People interested in testing could just work off the source. >> >> -Steve >> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Changes of note: >>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6. >>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin >>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist >>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5 >>> >>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant an rc2. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the iOS >>> repo >>>> recently (at least more than I have). >>>> >>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested here, >>> about >>>>> the known issues. >>>>> So we would stay on time. >>>>> _____________________ >>>>> Fabian Boulegue >>>>> tea inc. >>>>> CEO - Founder >>>>> Meierbrede 9 >>>>> 33100 Paderborn >>>>> >>>>> Mobile >>>>> >>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before >>> releasing >>>>>> 2.4.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this would >>>>>>> warrant >>>>>>> an rc2. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors >>> and >>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over >>> from, or >>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili >>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent! >
