Agree _____________________ Fabian Boulegue tea inc. CEO - Founder Meierbrede 9 33100 Paderborn
Mobile Am 29.01.2013 um 23:43 schrieb Shazron <[email protected]>: > Ah I get it now (Andrew's list of significant iOS commits) I suppose we > could internally tag an rc2 (not public release) and test the heck out of > it. Those iOS changes are critical bug fixes since rc1. > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Okay, that wasn't entirely clear... >> >> I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android, since >> most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree? >> >> Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should generally >> expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Andrew: sounds great. >>> >>> I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those >>> commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday. >>> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk >>> >>> (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^) >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <[email protected] >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off >> the >>>>> same version >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a >>> small >>>>>> group...? >>>>>> >>>>>> _____________________ >>>>>> Fabian Boulegue >>>>>> tea inc. >>>>>> CEO - Founder >>>>>> Meierbrede 9 >>>>>> 33100 Paderborn >>>>>> >>>>>> Mobile >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various >>> committers in >>>>>>> transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on >>>>>> Monday? >>>>>>>> People interested in testing could just work off the source. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Steve >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Changes of note: >>>>>>>>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6. >>>>>>>>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin >>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist >>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant >> an >>>>> rc2. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the >>> iOS >>>>>>>>> repo >>>>>>>>>> recently (at least more than I have). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested >>> here, >>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>> the known issues. >>>>>>>>>>> So we would stay on time. >>>>>>>>>>> _____________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue >>>>>>>>>>> tea inc. >>>>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder >>>>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9 >>>>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mobile >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before >>>>>>>>> releasing >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.0. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this >>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>> warrant >>>>>>>>>>>>> an rc2. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless >>> contributors >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over >>>>>>>>> from, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 . >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent! >>
