Yeah I see those too: http://ci.cordova.io/
Click on the outer donut sections for the stack trace / failing errors... On 2/20/13 12:33 PM, "Becky Gibson" <gibson.be...@gmail.com> wrote: >On iOS I'm failing one of the compass tests: CompassHeading should be >able >to create a new CompassHeading with no parameters. > > > > >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> K I've updated the JS tag. Platforms should grab the latest 2.5.0rc1 tag >> from cordova-js and retag + retest. >> >> On 2/20/13 12:02 PM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >Not clear (?) but I think so. I suppose all platforms get the new js >>and >> >re-test, and re-tag. >> > >> > >> > >> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> > >> >> So the JS needs to be retagged ya? >> >> >> >> On 2/20/13 11:03 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Not this time actually. This was a refactor in cordova-js where I >> >>forgot >> >> >to >> >> >"git add" the new files. It broke all existing tests. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Huzzah! >> >> >> >> >> >> I take it you pushed mobile spec test changes without the >>cordova-js >> >> >>code >> >> >> needed for them to pass? This is the downside of multi-repo :( >> >> >> >> >> >> -Michal >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Grieve >> >> >><agri...@chromium.org>wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Okay, checked them into next branch, and merged them into master >>as >> >> >>>well. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Likely filetransfer is broken on all platforms without these >>files. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Andrew Grieve >> >><agri...@chromium.org> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > I think I've figured it out: >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > agrieve@agrieve-macbookpro ~/git/cordova-js (next) $ git status >> >> >>> > # On branch next >> >> >>> > # Untracked files: >> >> >>> > # (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be >>committed) >> >> >>> > # >> >> >>> > # lib/common/plugin/filetransfer/ >> >> >>> > # lib/windowsphone/plugin/filetransfer/ >> >> >>> > nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git >> >>add" to >> >> >>> > track) >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > Whoops! >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Becky Gibson < >> >> gibson.be...@gmail.com >> >> >>> >wrote: >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> For added data, I also fail using the tagged cordova-js >> >> >>> >> (04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) built locally. >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> > I just generated the js from cordova-js on tag 2.5.0rc1 >>(hash >> >> >>> >> > 04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) and I get the same >> >> >>>results >> >> >>> as >> >> >>> >> > I've always had :/ >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Grieve >> >> >>><agri...@chromium.org >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> > wrote: >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > > Using the JS built from cordova-js it's working fine... >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Shazron >><shaz...@gmail.com >> > >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> > > > Could be the symbol mapping. >> >> >>> >> > > > Using Safari 6 iPhone Simulator debugging -- >> >> >>>window.FileTransfer >> >> >>> is >> >> >>> >> not >> >> >>> >> > > > defined, but I can do a >> >> >>> >> cordova.require("cordova/plugin/FileTransfer"). >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Shazron >> >><shaz...@gmail.com> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > > Don't know what's wrong - with mob-spec 3e3d075 on iOS >> >> >>> 2.5.0rc1 it >> >> >>> >> > > still >> >> >>> >> > > > > all fails. Trying iOS 2.4.0 (with latest mob-spec), it >> >>all >> >> >>> >> passes. I >> >> >>> >> > > > > suspect its in the cordova-js, not mob-spec >> >> >>> >> > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Shazron >> >><shaz...@gmail.com >> >> > >> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> Andrew, I re-verified and re-downloaded 2.5.0rc1 of >>iOS >> >>and >> >> >>> >> 2.5.0rc1 >> >> >>> >> > > of >> >> >>> >> > > > >> mobile-spec, created a new project - I get the same >> >>results >> >> >>> as I >> >> >>> >> had >> >> >>> >> > > > (both >> >> >>> >> > > > >> in Simulator and device as well). >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andrew Grieve < >> >> >>> >> > agri...@chromium.org >> >> >>> >> > > > >wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> Just tried the tests and they are all passing for me >> >>(on >> >> >>> >> simulator) >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Becky Gibson < >> >> >>> >> > > gibson.be...@gmail.com >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > This morning I did git pull apache next for >> >> >>>mobile-spec >> >> >>> and >> >> >>> >> got >> >> >>> >> > > > this: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > Updating 3e3d075..842e603 >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > Fast-forward >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > VERSION | 2 +- >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > autotest/tests/file.tests.js | 14 >> >> >>>++++++++++---- >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > autotest/tests/filetransfer.tests.js | 27 >> >> >>> >> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++------ >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > cordova.js | 2 +- >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > index.html | 1 + >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > misc/index.html | 3 ++- >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > misc/page2.html | 27 >> >> >>> >> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++----- >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > splashscreen/index.html | 47 >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > 8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18 >>deletions(-) >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > create mode 100644 splashscreen/index.html >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > Does that help? >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Shazron < >> >> >>> shaz...@gmail.com> >> >> >>> >> > > wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > That was my suspicion but i have no data on this >> >>yet. >> >> >>> Which >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > mob-spec version? I can verify. >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson >> >>wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday >>(using >> >>an >> >> >>> older >> >> >>> >> > > > version) >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> and >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > I >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > only had one failure so maybe the issue is >>with >> >>the >> >> >>> tests >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> themselves. >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron < >> >> >>> >> shaz...@gmail.com >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then copy >>:) >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal >>Mocny >> >> >>>wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > Shaz how did you generate that text file >> >>output? >> >> >>> Did >> >> >>> >> you >> >> >>> >> > > > open >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > remote >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > inspector and copy console output >>manually? >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron < >> >> >>> >> > > shaz...@gmail.com >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > <javascript:;>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running >> >>6.0.1 >> >> >>>(to >> >> >>> >> rule >> >> >>> >> > > out >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> any >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > errors >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > due >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number >>of >> >> >>>errors >> >> >>> as >> >> >>> >> the >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> previous >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > two >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > devices. >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, >>Shazron < >> >> >>> >> > > > shaz...@gmail.com >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22 >> >> >>> mobile-spec >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> failures (21 >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > related >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > to >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them >>tomorrow >> >> >>>and >> >> >>> fix >> >> >>> >> > for a >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> re-tag. >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > The >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a >> >>text >> >> >>> file. >> >> >>> >> > > Tested >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> on an >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > iPhone 5 >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS >> >>5.1.1, >> >> >>> exact >> >> >>> >> > same >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > failures. >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm >> >>Wong < >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >> >> >>>kingoftheo...@hotmail.com<javascript:;><javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1. >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > From: >>shaz...@gmail.com<javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > <javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08 >>-0800 >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1? >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > To: >> >>dev@cordova.apache.org<javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> <javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for >> >> >>>Eye-Oh-Ess, >> >> >>> >> > wrapping >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> things >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > up. >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, >>Joe >> >> >>> Bowser < >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > bows...@gmail.com<javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > Gone through the same process >>with >> >>Fil. >> >> >>> If >> >> >>> >> we >> >> >>> >> > > fail, >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> we >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > fail >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> together!!!! >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, >> >>Filip >> >> >>> Maj < >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > f...@adobe.com >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues for >> >> >>>2.5.0rc1 >> >> >>> >> > > tagging. >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next" >>branch >> >> >>>under >> >> >>> the >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> javascript >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > and >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > tagged >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> 2.5.0rc1 >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I did >>it >> >> >>>right >> >> >>> :s >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian >> >>LeRoux" < >> >> >>> >> > b...@brian.io >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > <javascript:;>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim to >> >>get >> >> >>>this >> >> >>> >> thing >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > tagged/bagged >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > today. >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23 >>AM, >> >> >>>Filip >> >> >>> >> Maj < >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > f...@adobe.com<javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do >>it. >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe >> >>Bowser" < >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> bows...@gmail.com >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote: >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work? Do >>we >> >> >>>create >> >> >>> the >> >> >>> >> > next >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> branch >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > now >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > and >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> throw >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >things in that? >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > > > >> >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>