Yeah I see those too:

http://ci.cordova.io/


Click on the outer donut sections for the stack trace / failing errors...

On 2/20/13 12:33 PM, "Becky Gibson" <gibson.be...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On iOS I'm failing one of the compass tests:  CompassHeading should be
>able
>to create a new CompassHeading with no parameters.
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> K I've updated the JS tag. Platforms should grab the latest 2.5.0rc1 tag
>> from cordova-js and retag + retest.
>>
>> On 2/20/13 12:02 PM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Not clear (?) but I think so. I suppose all platforms get the new js
>>and
>> >re-test, and re-tag.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> So the JS needs to be retagged ya?
>> >>
>> >> On 2/20/13 11:03 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agri...@chromium.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Not this time actually. This was a refactor in cordova-js where I
>> >>forgot
>> >> >to
>> >> >"git add" the new files. It broke all existing tests.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Huzzah!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I take it you pushed mobile spec test changes without the
>>cordova-js
>> >> >>code
>> >> >> needed for them to pass?  This is the downside of multi-repo :(
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Michal
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Grieve
>> >> >><agri...@chromium.org>wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Okay, checked them into next branch, and merged them into master
>>as
>> >> >>>well.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Likely filetransfer is broken on all platforms without these
>>files.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Andrew Grieve
>> >><agri...@chromium.org>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> > I think I've figured it out:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > agrieve@agrieve-macbookpro ~/git/cordova-js (next) $ git status
>> >> >>> > # On branch next
>> >> >>> > # Untracked files:
>> >> >>> > #   (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be
>>committed)
>> >> >>> > #
>> >> >>> > # lib/common/plugin/filetransfer/
>> >> >>> > # lib/windowsphone/plugin/filetransfer/
>> >> >>> > nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git
>> >>add" to
>> >> >>> > track)
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Whoops!
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Becky Gibson <
>> >> gibson.be...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> For added data,  I also  fail using the tagged cordova-js
>> >> >>> >> (04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) built locally.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> > I just generated the js from cordova-js on tag 2.5.0rc1
>>(hash
>> >> >>> >> > 04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) and I get the same
>> >> >>>results
>> >> >>> as
>> >> >>> >> > I've always had :/
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Grieve
>> >> >>><agri...@chromium.org
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > > Using the JS built from cordova-js it's working fine...
>> >> >>> >> > >
>> >> >>> >> > >
>> >> >>> >> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Shazron
>><shaz...@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > Could be the symbol mapping.
>> >> >>> >> > > > Using Safari 6 iPhone Simulator debugging --
>> >> >>>window.FileTransfer
>> >> >>> is
>> >> >>> >> not
>> >> >>> >> > > > defined, but I can do a
>> >> >>> >> cordova.require("cordova/plugin/FileTransfer").
>> >> >>> >> > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Shazron
>> >><shaz...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > > Don't know what's wrong - with mob-spec 3e3d075 on iOS
>> >> >>> 2.5.0rc1 it
>> >> >>> >> > > still
>> >> >>> >> > > > > all fails. Trying iOS 2.4.0 (with latest mob-spec), it
>> >>all
>> >> >>> >> passes. I
>> >> >>> >> > > > > suspect its in the cordova-js, not mob-spec
>> >> >>> >> > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Shazron
>> >><shaz...@gmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >> Andrew, I re-verified and re-downloaded 2.5.0rc1 of
>>iOS
>> >>and
>> >> >>> >> 2.5.0rc1
>> >> >>> >> > > of
>> >> >>> >> > > > >> mobile-spec, created a new project - I get the same
>> >>results
>> >> >>> as I
>> >> >>> >> had
>> >> >>> >> > > > (both
>> >> >>> >> > > > >> in Simulator and device as well).
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <
>> >> >>> >> > agri...@chromium.org
>> >> >>> >> > > > >wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> Just tried the tests and they are all passing for me
>> >>(on
>> >> >>> >> simulator)
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Becky Gibson <
>> >> >>> >> > > gibson.be...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > This morning I did   git pull apache next for
>> >> >>>mobile-spec
>> >> >>> and
>> >> >>> >> got
>> >> >>> >> > > > this:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > Updating 3e3d075..842e603
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > Fast-forward
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  VERSION                              |  2 +-
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  autotest/tests/file.tests.js         | 14
>> >> >>>++++++++++----
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  autotest/tests/filetransfer.tests.js | 27
>> >> >>> >> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++------
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  cordova.js                           |  2 +-
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  index.html                           |  1 +
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  misc/index.html                      |  3 ++-
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  misc/page2.html                      | 27
>> >> >>> >> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  splashscreen/index.html              | 47
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18
>>deletions(-)
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  create mode 100644 splashscreen/index.html
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > Does that help?
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Shazron <
>> >> >>> shaz...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > That was my suspicion but i have no data on this
>> >>yet.
>> >> >>> Which
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > mob-spec version? I can verify.
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson
>> >>wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday
>>(using
>> >>an
>> >> >>> older
>> >> >>> >> > > > version)
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> and
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > I
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > only had one failure so maybe the issue is
>>with
>> >>the
>> >> >>> tests
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> themselves.
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron <
>> >> >>> >> shaz...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then copy
>>:)
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal
>>Mocny
>> >> >>>wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > Shaz how did you generate that text file
>> >>output?
>> >> >>>  Did
>> >> >>> >> you
>> >> >>> >> > > > open
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > remote
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > inspector and copy console output
>>manually?
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron <
>> >> >>> >> > > shaz...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running
>> >>6.0.1
>> >> >>>(to
>> >> >>> >> rule
>> >> >>> >> > > out
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> any
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > errors
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > due
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number
>>of
>> >> >>>errors
>> >> >>> as
>> >> >>> >> the
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> previous
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > two
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > devices.
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM,
>>Shazron <
>> >> >>> >> > > > shaz...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22
>> >> >>> mobile-spec
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> failures (21
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > related
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > to
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them
>>tomorrow
>> >> >>>and
>> >> >>> fix
>> >> >>> >> > for a
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> re-tag.
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > The
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a
>> >>text
>> >> >>> file.
>> >> >>> >> > > Tested
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> on an
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > iPhone 5
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS
>> >>5.1.1,
>> >> >>> exact
>> >> >>> >> > same
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > failures.
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm
>> >>Wong <
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >
>> >> >>>kingoftheo...@hotmail.com<javascript:;><javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1.
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > From:
>>shaz...@gmail.com<javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08
>>-0800
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1?
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > To:
>> >>dev@cordova.apache.org<javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> <javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for
>> >> >>>Eye-Oh-Ess,
>> >> >>> >> > wrapping
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> things
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > up.
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM,
>>Joe
>> >> >>> Bowser <
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > bows...@gmail.com<javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > Gone through the same process
>>with
>> >>Fil.
>> >> >>>  If
>> >> >>> >> we
>> >> >>> >> > > fail,
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> we
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > fail
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> together!!!!
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM,
>> >>Filip
>> >> >>> Maj <
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > f...@adobe.com
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues for
>> >> >>>2.5.0rc1
>> >> >>> >> > > tagging.
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next"
>>branch
>> >> >>>under
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> javascript
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > and
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > tagged
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> 2.5.0rc1
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I did
>>it
>> >> >>>right
>> >> >>> :s
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian
>> >>LeRoux" <
>> >> >>> >> > b...@brian.io
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim to
>> >>get
>> >> >>>this
>> >> >>> >> thing
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > tagged/bagged
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > today.
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23
>>AM,
>> >> >>>Filip
>> >> >>> >> Maj <
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > f...@adobe.com<javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do
>>it.
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe
>> >>Bowser" <
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> bows...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work? Do
>>we
>> >> >>>create
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> >> > next
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> branch
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > now
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > and
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> throw
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >things in that?
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> >> >>> >> > > > >
>> >> >>> >> > > >
>> >> >>> >> > >
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>

Reply via email to