Hi Fil,
Since cordova-osx is functional now -- how do I add JIRA tasks to the
script (not sure where it is exactly) you used to add subtasks for a
release? I want to add "Update www/ application for OS X" and "Update
JavaScript for OS X" sub-tasks.


On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:

> Alright folks, mobile-spec and cordova-js are tagged 2.6.0rc1, and the
> 2.6.x branches on both those repos are now pushed up. Gogo release mode!
>
> On 3/21/13 9:12 AM, "James Jong" <wjamesj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Nice.  Thanks Michal.
> >
> >-James Jong
> >
> >On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, the intent is to have living branches.  We may also cherry-pick
> >> regressions back to more than just the current release.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, James Jong <wjamesj...@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Braden.  Is the intent to have 'living' branches for each major
> >>> release (e.g. 2.6, 3.0) which contain tags for release candidates and
> >>>minor
> >>> revisions?  So going forward we would have 2.6.x , 3.0.x, ... branches?
> >>>
> >>> -James Jong
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I meant to send an email about this last night. Here's the
> >>>>(high-level)
> >>>> process we'll need to follow for each of the repos.
> >>>>
> >>>> Step 0: This time only, delete the 'next' branch. We're not using them
> >>>> anymore, and they'll just add confusion.
> >>>> Step 1: Checkout and pull master.
> >>>> Step 2: git checkout -b 2.6.x (now you're on the new branch 2.6.x)
> >>>> Step 3: tag 2.6.0.rc1 (on the 2.6.x branch)
> >>>> Step 4: Push the branch and tag.
> >>>>
> >>>> NB: The branch is for the minor revision (ie. 2.6.x) not the point
> >>> release
> >>>> (2.6.0). The branch will have tags called 2.6.0rc1, 2.6.0rc2, etc. and
> >>> then
> >>>> 2.6.0. Any 2.6.1 that we do will be on this 2.6.x branch as well, just
> >>>> adding more tags.
> >>>>
> >>>> Remember that commits always land in master first. Regression fixes
> >>> should
> >>>> be cherry-picked to 2.6.x after being committed to master.
> >>>>
> >>>> Braden
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, James Jong <wjamesj...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Is the new release branching process for 2.6 posted somewhere?  I
> >>>>>didn't
> >>>>> see it searching through the emails.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -James Jong
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> My changes are in.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Alright sounds like we need to wait on those pull reqs.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Braden, if you get it in time, great, otherwise, not a big deal.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Related: can someone recap the newer release/branching/tagging
> >>> approach
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>> talked about at the face-to-face (and let's decide if we want to
> >>>>>>>use
> >>> it
> >>>>> or
> >>>>>>> not)?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 3/20/13 9:20 AM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'm trying to get CB-52 for FileTransfer upload/download and the
> >>>>>>>> keyboardformaccessorybar re-fix in as well - also seeing if the
> >>>>>>>> FileTransfer mobile-spec stuff works to test. Was planning on
> >>>>>>>>pulling
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>> the iOS pull requests but may not have time, but it seems Andrew
> >>>>>>>>is
> >>> on
> >>>>> it
> >>>>>>>> already :)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Braden Shepherdson
> >>>>>>>> <bra...@chromium.org>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'm working on rolling some of the plugin JS loading logic into
> >>>>>>>>> cordova-js.
> >>>>>>>>> If that makes this release then it will be possible to play with
> >>>>> plugman
> >>>>>>>>> without also needing bleeding-edge JS. Note that this logic
> >>>>>>>>>won't be
> >>>>>>>>> active
> >>>>>>>>> if there are no plugins, so it shouldn't be a high-risk change to
> >>>>> slide
> >>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> before a release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Andrew Grieve <
> >>> agri...@chromium.org
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Time's feeling right for a release.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I'm planning on going through pull requests today. Makes sense
> >>>>>>>>>>to
> >>> get
> >>>>>>>>> those
> >>>>>>>>>> all in before starting the release.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:49 AM, James Jong
> >>>>>>>>>><wjamesj...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> A couple of items I'd like to see get into 2.6:
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) Lorin's EXIF camera implementation
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) adding prompt dialog to the Notification API (completed,
> >>>>>>>>>>>just
> >>>>>>>>> needs
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>> be merged in)
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/24
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/21
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/35
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/35
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-mobile-spec/pull/13
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> -James Jong
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ya braden put that huge thread on the list w/ the docs..
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Haha have we even brought back the new method to the list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>since
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> F2F?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/13 3:21 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, lets give this new method a go.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we feeling for that? Are there any outstanding features
> >>> out
> >>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are on the cusp of landing, or can we go into rc + test
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mode
> >>>>>>>>>> soon-ish?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to