I feel pretty strongly that we shouldn't try to shove this in for 2.6.0. Regressions only at this point (since the branches have been cut).
Excited to see progress here though! by namespace - are you referring to Java namespaces? or plugin IDs? To answer your question about the JS, refer to this thread: http://callback.markmail.org/thread/vxmd3yrr5i5q27w3 On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey All, > > Last week I did some work around pulling out the Accelerometer plugin from > the cordova-android code and setting up how the plugin repo would look. I > have gone ahead and pushed my work onto the newly created device motion > repo ( > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-plugin-device-motion.git;a=summary > ). > > A couple questions have arisen from this work: > > 1) How are we handling the JS? I assume we will be pulling it out of > cordova.js and packaging it with the plugin. > > 2) How are we namespacing the plugins? core.name vs name.name? A > discussion > about this was happening in a earlier thread. ( > > http://callback.markmail.org/message/pbeovtkzi3a2tfkw?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Ecallback-dev+moving+plugins+to+core+namespace > ). > > Once we come to a consensus about these two questions, I can start ripping > out more plugins from cordova-android and start populating our new plugin > repos. > > Durring releases, I would just run plugman to include the api back into the > release (tests required). > > I am going to work with Shaz this week to rip out the Accel plugin from iOS > and get it setup on the same repo. > > > I know there was some talk about ripping out this plugin for 2.6.0 release. > How do you guys feel about this? 2.6.0 is schedule to go out end of this > week? > > Cheers, > -Steve >
