Unfortunate as we thought 2.6 was realistic a few weeks ago but I echo the sentiment. Too soon! Going to kick up a fresh thread on JS.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think it should go in for 2.6.0 as well, for the already mentioned > reasons. > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> I feel pretty strongly that we shouldn't try to shove this in for 2.6.0. >> Regressions only at this point (since the branches have been cut). >> >> Excited to see progress here though! >> >> by namespace - are you referring to Java namespaces? or plugin IDs? >> >> To answer your question about the JS, refer to this thread: >> http://callback.markmail.org/thread/vxmd3yrr5i5q27w3 >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hey All, >> > >> > Last week I did some work around pulling out the Accelerometer plugin >> from >> > the cordova-android code and setting up how the plugin repo would look. I >> > have gone ahead and pushed my work onto the newly created device motion >> > repo ( >> > >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-plugin-device-motion.git;a=summary >> > ). >> > >> > A couple questions have arisen from this work: >> > >> > 1) How are we handling the JS? I assume we will be pulling it out of >> > cordova.js and packaging it with the plugin. >> > >> > 2) How are we namespacing the plugins? core.name vs name.name? A >> > discussion >> > about this was happening in a earlier thread. ( >> > >> > >> http://callback.markmail.org/message/pbeovtkzi3a2tfkw?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Ecallback-dev+moving+plugins+to+core+namespace >> > ). >> > >> > Once we come to a consensus about these two questions, I can start >> ripping >> > out more plugins from cordova-android and start populating our new plugin >> > repos. >> > >> > Durring releases, I would just run plugman to include the api back into >> the >> > release (tests required). >> > >> > I am going to work with Shaz this week to rip out the Accel plugin from >> iOS >> > and get it setup on the same repo. >> > >> > >> > I know there was some talk about ripping out this plugin for 2.6.0 >> release. >> > How do you guys feel about this? 2.6.0 is schedule to go out end of this >> > week? >> > >> > Cheers, >> > -Steve >> > >>
