Was this on Craigslist?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:16 PM, tommy-carlos Williams <to...@devgeeks.org> wrote: > I saw a 2.2 device for sale the other day. I had a sad. > > +1 for dropping it. > > On 11/04/2013, at 6:11, Lucas Holmquist <lholm...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On our AeroGear project, the lowest thing we support on android is 2.3, so >> +1 for removing >> On Apr 10, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> >>> Lets give this a few days to make sure we're not about hurt anyone. >>> >>> (I'm in favor of removing support.) >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Michael Wolf >>> <michael.w...@cynergy.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Fwiw I wasn't saying 2.3, but 2.2. The consideration of supporting 2.3 >>>> goes based on who your consumer base is, and if 2.3 is worth it (had >>>> several customers recently where this is a serious discussion). AnywhoŠ >>>> loosing 2.2 I don't think would hurt the community greatly. >>>> >>>> mw >>>> >>>> On 4/10/13 2:54 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Anyone who thinks we don't need 2.3 support needs to look at what I >>>>> was considering purchasing for my US phone when on road trips to weird >>>>> places like Idaho: >>>> http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/prepay/getPhoneDetail.do?item=prepayIte >>>>> m&selectedPhoneId=6093&selectedPlanCatId=4997 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Michael Wolf <michael.w...@cynergy.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Generally we are pushing clients to not touch anything lower than 2.3 >>>>>> (And >>>>>> having serious discussions about their need for 2.3 support). So from a >>>>>> cordova users perspective this wouldn't bother me. >>>>>> >>>>>> mw >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/10/13 2:10 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Android 2.2 is a pain point because we only have one device in the >>>>>>> Vancouver office that is on that version of Android (LG Optimus 3D). >>>>>>> I'm sure that other places have more of them, but they are becoming >>>>>>> increasingly rare, and I'd rather us only have to test 2.3 and higher >>>>>>> when we prepare for a release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Braden Shepherdson >>>>>>> <bra...@chromium.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> Do we have a picture of what this would gain us? What are the pain >>>>>>>> points >>>>>>>> in terms of bugs or missing APIs between 2.2 and 2.3? I have the vague >>>>>>>> impression that there are several things, but I actually don't know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If there are advantages, I'm all for it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Braden >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Good news everyone! Android 2.2 (Froyo) has dipped below 5%. This >>>>>>>>> means that we can safely drop support for this version of Android and >>>>>>>>> set our lower bound to Android 2.3. The cool thing about this is >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> we will only support devices that you can actually buy in a store at >>>>>>>>> this point, which I think is something that we should aim towards. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Honestly, if Key Lime Pie figured out a way to get 4.x functionality >>>>>>>>> on single-core devices, that'd be awesome, but I highly doubt it. :( >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So, what do people think about getting rid of Froyo support? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Joe >>
