Ultimately its up to us how we want to run with it. Far prefer lazy consensus to voting.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> wrote: > Even in the pre-updated release steps, it explicitly says we need a vote > and refers to this "apache way" doc: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We decided on voting for each release? I thought it was lazy consensus (as >> with all decisions we make)? >> >> On 5/1/13 1:17 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >I'm not sure I saw the vote thread, nor an announcement release, but >> >issues >> >are being closed that indicate that it has happened. >> > >> >I appreciate everyone's effort in getting it out, but the vote is a super >> >important step because it's our last chance to say "is everyone >> >comfortable >> >with this release". >> > >> >I'd like to say that it was clearly documented on the release wiki page >> >(which it is)... but the wiki's been down for two days :P. >> >>
