+1 lazy consensus. Cordova has a consistent release schedule so voting on something that is predictable seems overkill.
If you feel you'd like to change the release process to include an official vote, Andrew, then we should start a vote on the private list, I.e. Vote-to-change-the-process kind of vote. On 5/1/13 3:37 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: >Ultimately its up to us how we want to run with it. Far prefer lazy >consensus to voting. > >On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> >wrote: >> Even in the pre-updated release steps, it explicitly says we need a vote >> and refers to this "apache way" doc: >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >> >> >> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> We decided on voting for each release? I thought it was lazy consensus >>>(as >>> with all decisions we make)? >>> >>> On 5/1/13 1:17 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >I'm not sure I saw the vote thread, nor an announcement release, but >>> >issues >>> >are being closed that indicate that it has happened. >>> > >>> >I appreciate everyone's effort in getting it out, but the vote is a >>>super >>> >important step because it's our last chance to say "is everyone >>> >comfortable >>> >with this release". >>> > >>> >I'd like to say that it was clearly documented on the release wiki >>>page >>> >(which it is)... but the wiki's been down for two days :P. >>> >>>
