I'll take a look at the state of CLI for 2.8.x. It should definitely be
tagged on the release branch, and if that branch is forked off of master it
should probably be rebased. I'll take a look at its state and adjust
appropriately.

Is CLI part of the release bundle, or is it pushed to npm instead?

Braden


On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Benn Mapes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Do IT! nice job.
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Steven Gill <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > Okay. Got it packaged up. 2.8.0rc1 can be found at
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cordova/.
> >
> > I will start another thread about starting the process for 2.8.0.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -Steve
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Lorin Beer <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > awesome, thanks!
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Steven Gill <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Working on it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Lorin Beer <
> [email protected]
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Steve, have you cut the release?
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > Updated the cli tag to be on 2.8.x branch
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Shazron <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Not sure who tagged 2.8.0rc1 on master2, but it really should
> have
> > > been
> > > >> >> tagged in the 2.8.x branch.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-cli.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master2
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Shazron <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>> Not sure how to proceed with this, I'm prob not the one to ask.
> > I'd
> > > say
> > > >> >>> since the stakeholders are away, probably leave it as is, and I
> > can
> > > >> tag it
> > > >> >>> later using coho.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Benn Mapes <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>> For the CLI I just updated master2 branch and tested it on
> > windows
> > > +
> > > >> mac
> > > >> >>>> and everything but the plugin add/remove works. If it still
> isn't
> > > >> tagged
> > > >> >>>> we
> > > >> >>>> might as well rebase the 2.8.x branch with master2. (I can do
> > this
> > > if
> > > >> >>>> people are ok with it, otherwise we can just leave it as is.)
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Lorin Beer <
> > > [email protected]
> > > >> >>>> >wrote:
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> > Anis, if you can test this for us before the end of today,
> > great.
> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > Otherwise, +1 for tagging at EOD, allowing Steve to cut the
> > > release
> > > >> >>>> > first thing tomorrow.
> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Shazron <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > > Someone more familiar with CLI should look at this. Looking
> > at
> > > the
> > > >> >>>> repo,
> > > >> >>>> > > the only sig. change was for Windows by Benn, after the
> last
> > > time
> > > >> Fil
> > > >> >>>> > > checked in code.
> > > >> >>>> > > According to the repo, running 'npm test' should run the
> > tests
> > > >> but I
> > > >> >>>> get
> > > >> >>>> > > this error below. Not sure how to proceed... by EOD I say
> > just
> > > tag
> > > >> >>>> it,
> > > >> >>>> > and
> > > >> >>>> > > if any issues arise we can fix for 2.8.0 final.
> > > >> >>>> > >
> > > >> >>>> > > ------------------------
> > > >> >>>> > >> [email protected] test
> > > /Users/shaz/Documents/Git/Apache/cordova-cli
> > > >> >>>> > >> ./node_modules/jasmine-node/bin/jasmine-node --color
> > > >> >>>> spec/cordova-cli
> > > >> >>>> > >
> > > >> >>>> > >
> > > >> >>>> > >
> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> /Users/shaz/Documents/Git/Apache/cordova-cli/node_modules/jasmine-node/lib/jasmine-node/index.js:24
> > > >> >>>> > > var minorVersion =
> process.version.match(/\d\.(\d)\.\d/)[1];
> > > >> >>>> > >                                                         ^
> > > >> >>>> > > TypeError: Cannot read property '1' of null
> > > >> >>>> > >     at Object.<anonymous>
> > > >> >>>> > >
> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> (/Users/shaz/Documents/Git/Apache/cordova-cli/node_modules/jasmine-node/lib/jasmine-node/index.js:24:57)
> > > >> >>>> > >     at Module._compile (module.js:456:26)
> > > >> >>>> > >     at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:474:10)
> > > >> >>>> > >     at Module.load (module.js:356:32)
> > > >> >>>> > >     at Function.Module._load (module.js:312:12)
> > > >> >>>> > >     at Module.require (module.js:364:17)
> > > >> >>>> > >     at require (module.js:380:17)
> > > >> >>>> > >     at Object.<anonymous>
> > > >> >>>> > >
> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> (/Users/shaz/Documents/Git/Apache/cordova-cli/node_modules/jasmine-node/lib/jasmine-node/cli.js:1:77)
> > > >> >>>> > >     at Module._compile (module.js:456:26)
> > > >> >>>> > >     at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:474:10)
> > > >> >>>> > > npm ERR! weird error 8
> > > >> >>>> > > npm ERR! not ok code 0
> > > >> >>>> > >
> > > >> >>>> > >
> > > >> >>>> > >
> > > >> >>>> > >
> > > >> >>>> > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Steven Gill <
> > > >> [email protected]
> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > >
> > > >> >>>> > >> I asked Fil. He said he hasn't looked at it recently. He
> > says
> > > it
> > > >> >>>> should
> > > >> >>>> > >> probably be tested.
> > > >> >>>> > >>
> > > >> >>>> > >> If everything gets tagged, I can look into packaging it up
> > > >> tomorrow
> > > >> >>>> and
> > > >> >>>> > >> releasing/announcing on the various channels.
> > > >> >>>> > >> On May 30, 2013 5:58 PM, "Lorin Beer" <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > >>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > this is for RC, and I assumed we would, but I don't
> think
> > > it's
> > > >> an
> > > >> >>>> > >> > absolute requirement...
> > > >> >>>> > >> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > Joe, can you bug Fil/Michael about the status of CLI and
> > > wether
> > > >> >>>> they
> > > >> >>>> > can
> > > >> >>>> > >> > tag?
> > > >> >>>> > >> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Joe Bowser <
> > > [email protected]
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>>> > wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > >> > > This is for RC1, right? Do we need docs to even be
> > tagged
> > > to
> > > >> do
> > > >> >>>> an
> > > >> >>>> > RC?
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Lorin Beer <
> > > >> >>>> > [email protected]>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >> Blocking issues on Mobile Spec have been tested and
> > > >> resolved.
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >> Mobile-Spec is now tagged.
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >> We are just waiting on Docs, and CLI.
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Shazron <
> > > [email protected]
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>>> > wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> Using coho to tag. D'oh - Andrew already tagged iOS,
> > > doing
> > > >> OS
> > > >> >>>> X
> > > >> >>>> > now
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Shazron <
> > > >> [email protected]>
> > > >> >>>> > wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>> I'm tagging iOS and OS X shortly....
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Al Harding <
> > > >> >>>> > >> [email protected]
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> I also sent off an email to Steve too to see about
> > > >> helping
> > > >> >>>> us
> > > >> >>>> > out.
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> Let's do this!
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> Al
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Lorin Beer <
> > > >> >>>> > >> > [email protected]
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > I think the delay is mostly due to our team
> being
> > > away
> > > >> at
> > > >> >>>> > >> > conferences
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> this
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > week.
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > components left to tag:
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > iOS
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > docs
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > CLI
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > Mobile Spec
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > I talked with Shaz on tuesday, there are no
> > > blockers on
> > > >> >>>> iOS.
> > > >> >>>> > He's
> > > >> >>>> > >> > at
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > fluent today, but I would imagine he could
> easily
> > > get
> > > >> it
> > > >> >>>> > tagged.
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > Joe, can you bug Michael and Fil to tag CLI and
> > > docs? I
> > > >> >>>> can
> > > >> >>>> > tag
> > > >> >>>> > >> > mobile
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > spec this afternoon if no one else does. Then
> > Steve
> > > can
> > > >> >>>> cut
> > > >> >>>> > the
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > release.
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > Let's get this done.
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > - Lorin
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Joe Bowser <
> > > >> >>>> > [email protected]>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > > It doesn't help that I'm at JSConf.  I'll tag
> > > >> Android if
> > > >> >>>> > this
> > > >> >>>> > >> > helps
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> moves
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > > things along.
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > > On May 30, 2013 1:15 PM, "Braden Shepherdson"
> <
> > > >> >>>> > >> > [email protected]>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> I think part of the delay here is because
> > Andrew,
> > > >> who's
> > > >> >>>> > been
> > > >> >>>> > >> > driving
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> a
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> large part of the release process, is at the
> > > >> hospital
> > > >> >>>> > having a
> > > >> >>>> > >> > baby
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > today.
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> We should survey the different release
> process
> > > bugs
> > > >> >>>> and see
> > > >> >>>> > >> what
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> still
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> needs to be done. Are any repos left
> untagged?
> > If
> > > >> not,
> > > >> >>>> > we're
> > > >> >>>> > >> > probably
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > ready
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> to create the rc1 bundle. If so, we should
> get
> > > them
> > > >> >>>> moving
> > > >> >>>> > >> > forward.
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> Braden
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Jesse <
> > > >> >>>> > >> [email protected]
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Are we ever going to move past 2.8.0rc1? Or
> > > even
> > > >> get
> > > >> >>>> rc1
> > > >> >>>> > >> out?
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Our new process does not seem to be helping
> > us,
> > > >> and
> > > >> >>>> I am
> > > >> >>>> > >> very
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > discouraged
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > given that we have a looming major release
> > and
> > > a
> > > >> firm
> > > >> >>>> > date
> > > >> >>>> > >> > target.
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Can we regroup? refocus?
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Cheers,
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> >   Jesse
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > @purplecabbage
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > risingj.com
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>
> > > >> >>>> > >> >
> > > >> >>>> > >>
> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to