http://xkcd.com/1172/
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Ken Wallis <[email protected]> wrote: > Ian 's point about bugs that have become "features" is also valid. Let's > ensure we don't start breaking expected behaviour that is now being worked > around. > > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. > Original Message > From: Brian LeRoux > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 12:37 PM > To: [email protected] > Reply To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: API changes between 2.9.x and 3.x > > ya no api upgrades for 2.9 series > > (but def should strive for API upgrades now that plugins are discreet) > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Marcel Kinard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Oct 16, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I'm thinking that we don't want to move things > > > like API changes back, since this could complicate the release, which > > > should just be about stability fixes. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential > information, privileged material (including material protected by the > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from > your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. > >
