did you try navigating to localhost:8000?? I just updated to latest (deployed) bits and its still broken for me
(can we start a new thread about ./platforms/html5 ?) On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > Just synced and cordova serve seems to work fine. Brian - are you sure it's > broken? > > We just had a thread on adding "html5" as a platform. If we did this, would > "cordova serve html5" be different from ripple's server? > > On serve's side - it is actually a customized static file server, since it > has a special "project.json" file that is there for app harness's needs. > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Ah, I'm getting the picture. I've only ever thought of using serve for > (a) > > app harness and (b) livereload on a device. For both those I wouldn't > want > > any mocking of cordova stuff at all. > > > > So what Ripple brings to the table is (c) the ability to run on > unsupported > > platforms via browser. > > > > I agree we want all these options, but I'm still not necessarily sold > that > > they should all be merged. Since I'm not doing the work, I'll trust you > > all to make the right call here! > > > > -Michal > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > > > > During the lull in Ripple's development it definitely felt risky but > the > > > project has become rather active again of late. The big advantage is > the > > > mocking for all the Cordova specific stuff (like deviceready). > > > > > > We do need a lightweight option for App Harness. I believe we can treat > > > Ripple as a middleware so maybe exposing this is the right way. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Forgive the ignorance, but, why should we be depending on ripple for > > > > implementing cordova serve? > > > > > > > > One advantage I see, is that we already do want to support Ripple as > a > > > > client, and I'm deducing that Ripple has a server component which > > serves > > > > files, so why reinvent the wheel, lets share code, great. > > > > > > > > One disadvantage that I see, is that Ripple (the client) is not > > > necessarily > > > > going to be used by everyone who wants to use cordova serve for e.g. > > app > > > > harness. So, ripple seems like a heavy dependency just to serve > files > > > for > > > > app harness -- does it even work on all platforms we target (windows > > > etc?). > > > > I remember having issues in the past with depending on it. > > > > > > > > Just want to understand what it buys and what it costs us before we > > move > > > > forward. > > > > > > > > -Michal > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Bryan Higgins < > br...@bryanhiggins.net > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > Is there a JIRA for the serve issue? Josh recently added some > content > > > to > > > > > make the landing page functional. > > > > > > > > > > Ripple integration sounds great. Gord - is there a way to make > ripple > > > run > > > > > chromeless for the app harness? > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Gord Tanner <gtan...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I can code up a quick sample integration to see what cordova > serve > > > > > (powered > > > > > > by ripple) would look like. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Josh Soref < > jso...@blackberry.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brian wrote: > > > > > > > > Feels like we're starting to regress rather often on the CLI > > > these > > > > > past > > > > > > > two releases. > > > > > > > > This is due to not running tests (or indeed writing them). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thats fine. Stuff happens. A gentle reminder: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - If there is a bug: write a test > > > > > > > > - If you are adding or refactoring code: run the tests > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/RunningTests isn't linked from > > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/IssueWorkflow > > > > > > > And the instructions in both sections are unusable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to improve both pages when I wake up. > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain > > > > confidential > > > > > > > information, privileged material (including material protected > by > > > the > > > > > > > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute > > > > > > non-public > > > > > > > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than > the > > > > > > intended > > > > > > > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission > > in > > > > > error, > > > > > > > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this > > information > > > > from > > > > > > > your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction > of > > > > this > > > > > > > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may > > be > > > > > > unlawful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
