Yes, that's what I determined in my testing. IMHO the other platforms should do 
that as well. No need to force both if the developer simply wants to set one of 
them. The docs say both are required - either Android is wrong or the other 
platforms are wrong.

I say we remove that reference from the docs and update the other platforms so 
they work like Android does. Android is right on only requiring one of the 
parameters plus it properly deals with the device in portrait or landscape mode 
(which iOS does not).

On 12/2/2013 10:18 PM, Simon MacDonald wrote:
IIRC on Android if you only specify the width or height it will determine
what the other value should be by using the same aspect ration as the
original image.


Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald


On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:15 PM, John M. Wargo <jwarg...@gmail.com> wrote:

A while back I posted a question regarding Camera targetWidth &
targetHeight properties and how they worked. After some discussion, the
conclusion I reached was that the documentation couldn't be correct about
how it worked since there was no way to determine the camera's resolution
with the current API but the docs said I had to provide both parameters.  I
said I'd do some testing and I have finally gotten around to completing it.
Here's what I discovered:

I created an application that allowed me to pass in different values for
targetWidth & targetHeight when taking a picture. I tested at the following
image sizes: 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768 as well as setting only the
targetWidth to 1024 or only the targetHeight to 768.

Here's the results:

Android
Portrait        Landscape
480x640         640x480
600x800         800x600
768x1024        1024x768
768x1024        1024x768
768x1024        1024x768



iOS
Portrait        Landscape
360x480         640x480
450x600         800x600
576x768         1024x768
2448x3264       3264x2448
2448x3264       3264x2448



Windows Phone 8
Portrait        Landscape
1836x3264       3264x1836
1836x3264       3264x1836
1836x3264       3264x1836
1836x3264       3264x1836
1836x3264       3264x1836


As you can see, Android properly implements the targetWidth & targetHeight
properties. On iOS, it supports setting both properties, but not instances
where only one is specified. Windows Phone 8 ignores the parameters
completely.  On iOS, when you turn the device on its side, the Camera API
applies the target width or height to the wrong axis (Android does this
well however).

I'm trying to test this on a BlackBerry device, but my development
environment is giving me fits right now. I'll work on it in the morning and
publish my results when I get them.

I would suggest that the android implementation is as expected and that
the other platforms need their implementations of targetWidth &
targetHeight adjusted so it works correctly. The documentation should be
updated as well as it's incorrect today specifying that both properties
must be provided.

If the group doesn't want to support only providing one of the properties,
then I would expect that the onError callback is called when only one is
provided rather than simply ignoring them as is the case with iOS and
Windows Phone.

I posted my sample application and a spreadsheet with my results to
https://github.com/johnwargo/camera_res_test

--
John M. Wargo
@johnwargo <http://twitter.com/johnwargo>
www.johnwargo.com <http://www.johnwargo.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------


Reply via email to