I'll make a JIRA issue on Tuesday and paste the link to it here.

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Ross Gerbasi <rgerb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Did this make it to jira? I also think its a good idea to pull config.xml
> out of the www root. Anyway to track this one?
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Dick Van den Brink <
> d_vandenbr...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> > I think it is a a good idea! So a +1
> >
> > Sent from my Windows Phone
> > ________________________________
> > From: Axel Nennker<mailto:ignisvul...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: 12/30/2013 20:47
> > To: dev<mailto:dev@cordova.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Moving www/config.xml -> config.xml (within CLI)
> >
> > I support this proposal.
> >
> > When I started work on CB-2606
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2606I noticed that the
> > element <icon src="icon.png"... />
> > suggests that icons are put next to config.xml as well.
> > When config.xml is in the project root it becomes more natural to put
> icons
> > in <project root>/res/icons/<platform>/icon.png
> >
> > -Axel
> >
> > ps:
> > I need opinions on my current implementation of CB-2606.
> > https://github.com/AxelNennker/cordova-cli
> > Please chime in to the email thread with the subject "Started
> Implementing
> > CB-2606 Add support for <icon in config.xml"
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/30 Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
> >
> > > I thought this was previously discussed, but I can't find any JIRA
> issues
> > > or old emails about it.
> > >
> > > Proposal:
> > > For CLI projects:
> > > - Use www/config.xml if it exists
> > > - Otherwise use ./config.xml
> > > - Change the project template to use ./config.xml by default
> > >
> > >
> > > Reasons:
> > > - Paths in config.xml are relative to project root
> > > - Prevents a copy of config.xml ended up in platforms/*/www
> > > - Manifests are generally found at the top-level of projects.
> > >
> > >
> > > Sound good? If so I'll make an issue and work on this. Since it's
> > holidays,
> > > will wait until next week Tuesday (Jan 7) to proceed.
> > >
> > > Andrew
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to