All auto-tests pass on iOS using cordova-mobile-spec 3.4.0rc1. Updating
release notes and tagging.


On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> wrote:

> There are over a month worth of changes for CLI, so I'd like to do a
> release of it before we bump it to 3.4.0. WDYT of just publishing to
> "cordova-alt" on NPM until our package gets fixed?
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Steven Gill <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Sounds great Shaz!
> >
> > I am thinking we get the RC out this week (tomorrow or Thursday) and aim
> > for final release next week (Tuesday?)
> >
> > Let me know if that sounds good to all of you.
> >
> > I will have to do a plugins release in the next day or two. The tools
> > release will come out right after the platforms get the rc tag and again
> > after the final tag on the platforms.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I plan to test and tag 3.4.0 iOS today if there are no objections.
> > >
> > > - went through all the iOS issues and labelled the ones that are core
> > with
> > > 'core' :
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CB%20AND%20issuetype%20in%20standardIssueTypes()%20AND%20component%20%3D%20iOS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20core%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Openand
> > > tried to resolve them as best I could
> > > - the 14 core issues left don't seem critical
> > > - left the iOS plugin issues for later since they have a different
> > release
> > > schedule
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Steven Gill <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > James: it totally will.
> > > >
> > > > I plan on doing a tools release, plugins release and platforms
> release
> > > for
> > > > 3.4.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:22 AM, James Long <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This thread is getting quite broad but I need to make you guys
> aware
> > > > > of this: the camera plugin is currently totally broken for Firefox
> OS
> > > > > and the fix has been waiting on the dev branch for weeks. I want to
> > > > > make sure that the fix is going to be merged into master and go out
> > > > > with 3.4: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3204
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > OK, Got it working now.  I just tagged it.  I'll update the
> ticket
> > > > > > once JIRA stops reindexing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Steven Gill <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> Looks like coho was changed to use grunt cordovajs which doesn't
> > > > exist.
> > > > > My
> > > > > >> local copy didn't have that change. I will push up my coho
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Steven Gill <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> ./coho prepare-release-branch --version 3.4.0-rc1 -r android
> > > > > >>> ./cordova-android/ =========== Executing: git fetch --progress
> > > origin
> > > > > >>> ./cordova-android/ =========== Executing: git fetch --progress
> > > --tags
> > > > > >>> origin
> > > > > >>> ./cordova-android/ =========== Confirmed already up-to-date:
> > > > > >>> cordova-android
> > > > > >>> ./cordova-android/ =========== Executing: git checkout -b 3.4.x
> > > > > >>> Switched to a new branch '3.4.x'
> > > > > >>> ./cordova-js/ ================ Executing: git checkout -q
> > 3.4.0-rc1
> > > > > >>> ./cordova-js/ ================ Executing: grunt
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> why are our last lines different?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Hey
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> It looks like something either changed with cordova-js or with
> > > coho,
> > > > > >>>> because I can't get coho to build:
> > > > > >>>> jbowser-MacBookPro:~ jbowser$ cordova-coho/coho
> > > > prepare-release-branch
> > > > > >>>> --version 3.4.0-rc1 -r cordova-android
> > > > > >>>> ./cordova-android/ =========== Executing: git fetch --progress
> > > > apache
> > > > > >>>> ./cordova-android/ =========== Executing: git fetch --progress
> > > > --tags
> > > > > >>>> apache
> > > > > >>>> ./cordova-android/ =========== Confirmed already up-to-date:
> > > > > >>>> cordova-android
> > > > > >>>> ./cordova-android/ =========== Executing: git checkout 3.4.x
> > > > > >>>> Already on '3.4.x'
> > > > > >>>> ./cordova-js/ ================ Executing: git checkout -q
> > > 3.4.0-rc1
> > > > > >>>> ./cordova-js/ ================ Executing: grunt cordovajs
> > > > > >>>> Warning: Task "cordovajs" not found. Use --force to continue.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I'm going to have to proceed manually with the tagging and
> > > > vendoring.
> > > > > >>>> The next time we change how we build the JS, can we make sure
> > coho
> > > > > >>>> works with it, otherwise there's no point having it.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Josh Soref <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> > Fwiw, cordova-blackberry is currently broken due to the
> > > config.xml
> > > > > >>>> > move.
> > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > >>>> > We need to land a fix for this.
> > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > >>>> >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >>>> > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain
> > > > > confidential
> > > > > >>>> > information, privileged material (including material
> protected
> > > by
> > > > > the
> > > > > >>>> > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or
> > constitute
> > > > > non-public
> > > > > >>>> > information. Any use of this information by anyone other
> than
> > > the
> > > > > intended
> > > > > >>>> > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
> > transmission
> > > in
> > > > > error,
> > > > > >>>> > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this
> > > information
> > > > > from your
> > > > > >>>> > system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of
> > > this
> > > > > >>>> > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and
> > may
> > > be
> > > > > unlawful.
> > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to