I send pull request to GitHub and explain my rationale for that
implementaiton.
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugins/pull/5



2014-02-25 13:58 GMT+06:00 Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>:

> Core plugins exist in their own repo by themselves and are cross-platform
> generally. Core plugins are also released weekly.
> The StatusBar plugin has none of those attributes. cordova-plugins are
> really "labs" kinda stuff.
>
> In any case, you could always fork the repo and send a pull request, we can
> continue discussion there (Github) regarding its applicability/suitability.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's not in its own repo, that's the main difference.  The iOS Status
> > Bar and its adjustable opacity is unique to iOS.  On Android, an app
> > can either be Full Screen and block the notification bar, or non-full
> > screen and have the notification bar appear.  A config.xml setting
> > doesn't need a special plugin.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Tommy-Carlos Williams
> > <to...@devgeeks.org> wrote:
> > > Calling that not core seems a stretch (since it's in an apache cordova
> > repo and all), but the maintainer is Shazron, as far as I know... if that
> > helps.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 25 Feb 2014, at 5:29 pm, Andrey Kurdumov <kant2...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I want to extend StatusBar plugin to support Android. And yesterday I
> > file
> > >> issue
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-6095. It was soon closed
> with
> > >> suggestion contact plugin maintainer, because StatusBar is not core
> > plugin.
> > >> Maybe I file issue incorrectly, and specify wrong component/ something
> > >> else, not sure about this.
> > >> But I clearly see the StatusBar plugin in
> > >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugins repository which is clone
> of
> > >> git://git.apache.org/cordova-plugins.git
> > >> Both seems to be belonging to Cordova project.
> > >>
> > >> I do have fix for this issue, and willing to contribute that back.
> > >> What route should I take?
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to