My point is only that we should be consistent. If the platform element is used for preference, then why introduce an attribute which does the same thing for icon?
Also, I've seen platform=, cdv:platform= and gap:platform= within the pull requests. On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Axel Nennker <ignisvul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > considering how difficult is is to get this icon thing is I would like to > postpone splash screen discussion after this is merged or rejected. > On the other hand there were discussions on this list about splash screen > support/changes not so long ago. I did not join those because even this > very small icon thing - that does not even introduce new > elements/formats/whatnot that would require us to support it until hell > freezes - takes ages to get accepted. > > One thing regarding icon vs splash: I think that icon/launcher_icon is more > an OS thing while splash is more a app thing. > > cheers > Axel > > > > 2014-04-03 14:46 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Bond-Caron <jbo...@gdesolutions.com>: > > > On Thu Apr 3 05:06 AM, Axel Nennker wrote: > > > It is a shame that CB-2606 is unresolved this long. We should have > > something > > > rolled out soon. > > > > > > > +1, thoughts on splashscreens or other images? > > > > > > >
