I added this to edge when it came up on the list a few weeks ago. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-docs.git;a=blobdiff;f=docs/en/edge/config_ref/index.md;h=9c32672403f1ceffce4278aa7e1fa6add7065946;hp=2df993147957cfe6f626f8a08e4a455557889e4d;hb=7598207d0e4395905c009c056947a5a7c9930b1a;hpb=b28cb8be613f637f28dbfd3c0db2bd193e7abb51
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > Feel pretty strongly that we shouldn't introduce gap: prefix. cdv: is bad > enough :(. I'm sure PG Build will accept whatever syntax we come up with. > > It's true that <platform> isn't documented (that I know of), but it's > consistent with plugin.xml and I think being able to put any elements in > there makes it quite flexible. > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Bryan Higgins <br...@bryanhiggins.net > >wrote: > > > My point is only that we should be consistent. If the platform element is > > used for preference, then why introduce an attribute which does the same > > thing for icon? > > > > Also, I've seen platform=, cdv:platform= and gap:platform= within the > pull > > requests. > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Axel Nennker <ignisvul...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > considering how difficult is is to get this icon thing is I would like > to > > > postpone splash screen discussion after this is merged or rejected. > > > On the other hand there were discussions on this list about splash > screen > > > support/changes not so long ago. I did not join those because even this > > > very small icon thing - that does not even introduce new > > > elements/formats/whatnot that would require us to support it until hell > > > freezes - takes ages to get accepted. > > > > > > One thing regarding icon vs splash: I think that icon/launcher_icon is > > more > > > an OS thing while splash is more a app thing. > > > > > > cheers > > > Axel > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-04-03 14:46 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Bond-Caron < > jbo...@gdesolutions.com > > >: > > > > > > > On Thu Apr 3 05:06 AM, Axel Nennker wrote: > > > > > It is a shame that CB-2606 is unresolved this long. We should have > > > > something > > > > > rolled out soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1, thoughts on splashscreens or other images? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
