I agree with Marcel. We should give it more time and bump it to a future release. On May 1, 2014 8:42 AM, "Marcel Kinard" <cmarc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given the recent thread on "customer pain points", I'd suggest that this > capability be released when there is confidence that it works well, and any > breakages are understood and minimized. Reading the other threads, sounds > like it's not quite there yet. > > On May 1, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Should we just be cautious and bump to 3.6, or do we give you till > Monday? > > > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Ian Clelland <iclell...@chromium.org> > wrote: > > > >> Currently, I think that pluggable webview is a non-starter for 3.5.0; > >> there's an unfortunate backwards-incompatibility introduced by > abstracting > >> CordovaWebView from a class into an interface. > >> > >> /me swears at Java for not having either multiple inheritance or > non-static > >> fields on interfaces... > >> > >> I'm playing with one possible solution to this today; if it works, then > we > >> might be able to get this in to 3.5, but I'm not 100% confident yet. > I'll > >> have to let you know later today. > >
