Actually it looks like it was already fixed on master. But the issue was with the test case itself.
Thanks, Edna Morales From: Edna Y Morales/Durham/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@cordova.apache.org Date: 10/15/2014 09:13 AM Subject: Re: Whitelist Test case failing in Mobilespec 3.6.3 I submitted a pull request to fix this test case, but it has not been merged in yet. Although now it has merge conflicts that I need to resolve before it can get pulled in. https://github.com/apache/cordova-mobile-spec/pull/107 Thanks, Edna Morales "Joshi, Pavankumar" ---10/14/2014 09:12:52 PM---Hello devs, I am currently testing mobilespec 3.6.3 and I found a test case failing in whitelist. From: "Joshi, Pavankumar" <jos...@fast.au.fujitsu.com> To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" <dev@cordova.apache.org> Date: 10/14/2014 09:12 PM Subject: Whitelist Test case failing in Mobilespec 3.6.3 Hello devs, I am currently testing mobilespec 3.6.3 and I found a test case failing in whitelist. The test case is written like itShouldMatch('file:///foo.html', [ ]); As I understand that a new whitelist URL file:///foo.html< file:///\\foo.html> is added and then tested for the pattern "[]". The API whitelist.isUrlWhiteListed(url); returns false which means that blank patterns are not allowed. But the test cases expects the return value to be true. Hence the test case fails. Now is it the mistake of the test case or the API? What should I do to make this test case pass? Please can you tell me where is an explanation about Whitelist "match" and "test" API explained and what does a pattern stand for? Thanks in advance Thanks and Regards Pavan Joshi