That's a good point. Perhaps we should update our template to say "minium or 48 hours, and at least 24 hours after the last non-vote comment"
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's nothing wrong with the practice except that a vote thread with > comments means that we probably shouldn't proceed and should discuss it > more. Too much discussion on vote thread means we don't have any sort of > consensus and should work that out first. > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015, 12:52 PM Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Have become very common for us. Probably because the release VOTE is the > > thing that actually gets people motivated to take a good look. > > > > Thought it'd be good for us to discuss this practice. > > > > My thoughts: > > - I think it still makes sense to DISCUSS before starting a release > > - I think it's perfectly reasonable to go through several RCs as things > > come up during testing (RCs are easy) > > - I think it helps to have the blog post ready before a vote (I made this > > change to the platforms release process this time around) > > - I don't have any problem with VOTE threads that are full of discussion. > > What's the concern? > > >
