Tony wrote: > FWIW, I don¹t think that Cordova JIRA is horrible. > We use JIRA at Intel and have had a lot of intermittent performance > problems that were mostly resolved with a recent version update. > It seems like a lot of effort has been invested in the Cordova JIRA and it > seems (to me) like it would be a shame to move away from it. > I¹ll leave it at that and comment on your other thread Michal.
Fwiw, we use JIRA at work, and I hate that JIRA much more than I hate Apache's JIRA. We also have a GitHub tracker that we use for WebWorks. I'm not a big fan of it, but the simplicity is a nice thing relative to all of the mandatory knobs in my least favorite JIRA. GitHub's linking features are vaguely nice. Note: in general, I'm a proponent of being able to review the history of code and being able to understand why a change was made. Traditionally, that involves looking at a bug tracker and reading the bug. However, neither JIRAs I've mentioned today are used that way, often they're at best Process Shepherds, and often they're just full of noise. I don't need a Process Shepherd, and if I have to have one, I'd rather it be Pull Requests. A funny thing to consider in this area: Instead of having a vote thread which people can email -- and which frequently spirals out of control. We could have a Vote RC file, and people could pull request their +1s. No one in their right mind would try to add a long comment into such a vote file. But, we could have a discuss thread. And we could receive emails about pull requests for the +1s. Such a thing could be trackable, in a meaningful way... And your commit message / pull request for a +1 could explain what you tested. > On the other hand (and this is the real point I wanted to make), the wiki > is horrible. > It is barely useable and it¹s poor performance is a major de-motivator > when it comes to editing it. Its performance definitely isn't a plus. The process of managing accounts is a bumber. I'd certainly favor a pull request model (which GitHub pages would give me). > There are important documents and information that only exist on the wiki! > In one of the other threads, Carlos suggested using Github wiki - it seems > like this would be a great change to me if it is possible. > From my perspective, this would be a far more valuable change than moving > from JIRA to Github Issues. > Just wanted to raise it since you seem to be interested in spinning some > of these topics off into dedicated discussion threadsŠ I've seen some projects try using GitHub pages, and I haven't seen many where it works particularly well. OTOH, I haven't seen *anything* that works particularly well.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
