Right Right +1 We can move our bugs to GitHub its up to the active committers to decide and make it happen since they are the ones that has the most work to deal with short term. Maintain both systems during some transition time I guess.
Canonical source and a fist its what's need to remain on apache servers. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:10 PM Murat Sutunc <mura...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Yes +1 ! > Now if only we could move our bugs as well :P > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 11:57 AM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: Update plugin's package.json git url to github mirrors. > > +1 easier onboarding of contributors > > > My team is hiring! > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 this will drive more contribution. > > Keeping it to Apache git doesn't help the project -- since the > > committers already know where the main repo is, but this would confuse > others. > > > > Not sure about multiple repository fields, I suppose it's possible... > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > How do people feel about changing the repo field in the package.json > > > for our plugins to point to the github mirror instead of apache git > repo? > > > > > > The url gets listed at > > https://www.npmjs.com/package/cordova-plugin-camera > > > on the left. The github mirror is much nicer looking and we receive > > > all > > of > > > our PRs on github too. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > >
