That was source and dist, not fist :-) even though I had my fist up while writing this email On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:00 PM Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Right Right +1 > > We can move our bugs to GitHub its up to the active committers to decide > and make it happen since they are the ones that has the most work to deal > with short term. Maintain both systems during some transition time I guess. > > Canonical source and a fist its what's need to remain on apache servers. > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:10 PM Murat Sutunc <mura...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> Yes +1 ! >> Now if only we could move our bugs as well :P >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 11:57 AM >> To: dev@cordova.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Update plugin's package.json git url to github mirrors. >> >> +1 easier onboarding of contributors >> >> >> My team is hiring! >> @purplecabbage >> risingj.com >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 this will drive more contribution. >> > Keeping it to Apache git doesn't help the project -- since the >> > committers already know where the main repo is, but this would confuse >> others. >> > >> > Not sure about multiple repository fields, I suppose it's possible... >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > How do people feel about changing the repo field in the package.json >> > > for our plugins to point to the github mirror instead of apache git >> repo? >> > > >> > > The url gets listed at >> > https://www.npmjs.com/package/cordova-plugin-camera >> > > on the left. The github mirror is much nicer looking and we receive >> > > all >> > of >> > > our PRs on github too. >> > > >> > > Thoughts? >> > > >> > >> >
