My idea: Make iOS 9 use WKWebView as default without plugin and iOS 8 and previous use UIWebView, then if people want WKWebView on iOS 8 they install the existing plugin with the webserver
2015-08-05 5:54 GMT+02:00 Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>: > +1 Carlos > > On Wednesday, August 5, 2015, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I would like to see by default or configuration setting be able to have > > that combination "WKWebView plugin only works on iOS 9 and older iOSes > > fallback to UIWebView" > > > > I can already hear customers asking too many questions about running a > > webserver inside their app (i.e. security, energy, old hacks on their > own > > custom plugins, etc). I prefer to have the option to tell them it's a > > choice it's very easy to select to not have a webserver at all. > > > > - Carlos > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Aug 4, 2015, at 8:16 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > > My thinking -- It'll be a hybrid approach - iOS 8 uses local-web > server, > > > iOS 9 doesn't. We'll have to support both if the dev deploys to an > older > > > target (the final fallback is UIWebView) > > > > > > Either that or WKWebView plugin only works on iOS 9 and older iOSes > > > fallback to UIWebView. > > > > > >> On Wednesday, August 5, 2015, Edna Y Morales <eymor...@us.ibm.com > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> Since the file:// url loading bug was fixed for WKWebView in iOS 9, > are > > we > > >> going to move away from the local webserver solution? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Edna Morales > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > <javascript:;> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > > <javascript:;> > > > > >
