I would recommend leaving it up, and developing the text in the wiki (even if it is eventually moved somewhere else). This gives us a chance to codify some of the things that are already in place - e.g. I noticed there’s nothing on the testing page and was planning to write that soon.
Of course, when one of us contributes something to the wiki, there will sometimes be disagreements about some of the content - but that opens up the opportunity for discussion, and we at least have a “base” version of the content to work on, and we can all participate in updating the content to reflect our discussions and what we agree on. If we don’t have anything to put (draft) versions of content, wouldn’t this make discussion more difficult? — Dr Peter M. Kelly [email protected] PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key> (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966) > On 7 Jan 2015, at 2:44 am, jan i <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > I can very easily (without loosing anything) either empty the pages or > substitute index.html with a "to be done". > > That gives the community time to discuss all aspects of this without having > it published. > > I prefer to replace index.html > > thoughts? > jan i > > > -- > Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
