On Tuesday, January 6, 2015, Peter Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > I would recommend leaving it up, and developing the text in the wiki (even > if it is eventually moved somewhere else). This gives us a chance to codify > some of the things that are already in place - e.g. I noticed there’s > nothing on the testing page and was planning to write that soon. > > Of course, when one of us contributes something to the wiki, there will > sometimes be disagreements about some of the content - but that opens up > the opportunity for discussion, and we at least have a “base” version of > the content to work on, and we can all participate in updating the content > to reflect our discussions and what we agree on. > > If we don’t have anything to put (draft) versions of content, wouldn’t > this make discussion more difficult?
ok I will leave it up. i need to concentrate on a couple of other issues fir some days. rgds jan i > > — > Dr Peter M. Kelly > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key> > (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966) > > > On 7 Jan 2015, at 2:44 am, jan i <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > I can very easily (without loosing anything) either empty the pages or > > substitute index.html with a "to be done". > > > > That gives the community time to discuss all aspects of this without > having > > it published. > > > > I prefer to replace index.html > > > > thoughts? > > jan i > > > > > > -- > > Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings. > > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
