> On 23 Mar 2015, at 10:32, jan i <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 23 March 2015 at 13:09, Franz de Copenhague < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> ReviewBoard is a very productive tool to review code and I have realized >> that apache has this tool. https://reviews.apache.org/groups >> >> >> >> So far, I have learnt that each project has its corresponding group in >> review board. I would like to use this tool to submit patches and code >> change, and other developers can review them and discuss the changes and >> provide feedbacks at coding level. >> >> >> >> I don't know who administrate reviewboard to request a new group for >> Corinthia project. >> > > I have an idea, let me check it. > > But I do think that Jira is a better tool, because we then have the history. > > I have no strong bias on reviewboard or jira, but I think we should only > use one of them. > > What do others think?
Having used many such tools I’ve come to like Jira, despite its flaws. Also: it’s what others here (Apache) use. That’s not irrelevant, esp. if we want to engage others within Apache. louis > > rgds > jan I. > > >> >> >> Juande >> >> >> >> >> >>
