On 26 March 2015 at 17:44, Gabriela Gibson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Jan (and Franz!), > > I can make a page on the wiki about it, once I have the net back. > Sounds good, but you will not the the net back, I am some other millions of users need it :-) Since it is Thursday, you might get access to it. And do please remember I am about 3.000km away, so physical violence is very hard. Have a nice evening. rgds jan i. Ps. When do you think you will have a stable connection again ? > G > On 26 Mar 2015 16:24, "jan i" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Corinthia is created on reviewBoard. > > > > rgds > > jan i. > > > > On 23 March 2015 at 20:35, jan i <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > For Info, I have created: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9323 > > > > > > to hopefully make this happen. > > > > > > rgds > > > jan I. > > > > > > > > > On 23 March 2015 at 20:07, Gabriela Gibson <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Oh I c. That looks pretty neat. The automated uploading tools look > > >> inviting, so does the diff display. > > >> > > >> I would definitely be interested in trying it out :-) > > >> > > >> G > > >> On 23 Mar 2015 18:08, "Franz de Copenhague" < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > ---------------------------------------- > > >> > > > > >> > > 1. What does the review tool give us that Jira or the mailing list > > >> > doesn't? > > >> > > > >> > Basically ReviewBoard allows us to send a code review of our code > > >> without > > >> > sending a patch and it has a mechanism to provide feedback in the > code > > >> > review. For example: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32219/diff/# > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > 2. How would we use Jira together with the review tool? > > >> > > > >> > In any JIRA comment just add a link to the reviewboard and people > can > > >> > access to your code. Like this says: > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Review+Board > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > 3. I just realised I didn't close issues I resolved in Jira (will > do > > >> > once I > > >> > > have inet back) so I am wondering about the extra administrative > > >> overhead > > >> > > using the review board this would add, as in that we would have to > > >> keep 2 > > >> > > tools up to date and have 3 places to visit. > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > After getting a code review request people use to click on "ship it" > > >> check > > >> > box or send back their concerns. This is the only thing to do with > > >> > ReviewBoard. The rest of task managment workflow is done in JIRA > like > > >> it is > > >> > now. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > franz > > >> > > > > > > > > >
