I notice that files ending in "~" can show up in the repository. These are usually local backups of files that have been edited and should not be in the repository.
I also notice that the .gitignore does not eliminate other artifacts that are not needed in the repository. I have updated the .gitignore (on master, at least) to ignore more cases of artifacts that may arise in editing and building but that are not part of the repository or released code. Some of this may simply be valuable as documentation for what we keep out of the repository in direct form. I have also added external/download/* to the .gitignore. Is the folder used any longer? (I can no longer find the scripts that were used to download and extract the externals for Windows builds. Have they been removed and I simply missed it?) Please review for others that might be needed, especially for non-Windows platform cases. PS: I notice that under Editor/src/3rdparty/showdown there is a license.txt file that has requirements for NOTICE. (The license is BSD-like.) - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: jan i [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2015 02:23 To: jan i <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Release_0.1 Release branch should now be ready for testing (after the zip error is done with). I will continue with LICENSE and NOTICE later today Before somebody tells me, yes I did overwrite README.md on trunk, but it is because I try to make sure all Release changes go back to trunk, and with that it is easier to expand README.md for our next release, than to make the changes already made. rgds jan I. On 5 August 2015 at 22:48, jan i <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > > I have created branch Release_0.1, this is not intended to be a temporary > branch. > > All changes we make to get the release out, goes in here and are > (depending on the change) > also done on master. > > Please do not make changes on this branch, unless we have discussed it. > > Peter@ you said you would do README.md and CONTRIBUTORS.md in root ? > > My next steps are to update LICENSE and NOTICE files. > > Then one of the IPMC release checkers have promised to look through it, > before we waste > vote time etc. > > After that, we vote (Andrea provided a fab. link). > > And finally it is time for the IPMC to vote (a step we bypass once we are > TLP). > > Hope we can make a release this month. > rgds > jan i. > >
