How about _dshow and _vshow? Hmmm, I liked those better until I saw them typed out.

-Damien


On Jan 12, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Chris Anderson wrote:

Is there a better url path than _show_view? Let's imagine a query
(with descriptive names):

Viewing the "sofa/resent-posts" view with show the function "as-html",
this is option (B)

B) GET /db/_show_view/sofa/as-html/recent-posts

Maybe this would look better like:

D) GET /db/_look/sofa/recent-posts/as-html

except _look is kinda silly. I do think having readable urls, is a
good way to relax.

(D) translates as

D) GET /db/_look/designname/myview/myshow



On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Chris Anderson <jch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Ulises <ulises.cerv...@gmail.com> wrote:
A) GET /db/_show_view/mydesign/myview
B) GET /db/_show_view/mydesign/myshowfunc/myview
C) GET /db/_view/mydesign/myview?strartkey="foo"&show=myshowfunc

Call me thick but C looks cleaner to me.

{
...
"show" : {
"docs" : { ... },
"views" : {
  "myshowfunc" : "function(row, head) { ... }"
}
}

how about including your show fns in show { } ?

that's what's above

show funcs for documents are at

ddoc.show.docs

and show funcs for views are at

ddoc.show.views


I'm leaning B or C as well.

My main reservation about C is what it will do to the internals.
Erlang actions that are scoped to a _private_path URL can be kept in
their own module and moved around via the config API. If we amke it an
options on regular views, we lose that freedom.

Also, I do like the current URL scheme for document show funcs, partly
for the config reason, but also because I think

GET /db/_show/mydesign/myshowfunc/docid

is clearer than

GET /db/docid?show=mydesign/myshowfun


{
...
views: {
  foo : { map : ... }
},
show: {
  as_xml: function(...) { ... },
}
}

I'm leaning toward letting the user decide at query-time which view to
render using which show-func, that is, options B or C.

Well I thought that that was a given, flexibility so that users can
define a couple of views, a couple of shows so that the combinations
then are more useful.

U




--
Chris Anderson
http://jchris.mfdz.com




--
Chris Anderson
http://jchris.mfdz.com

Reply via email to