Antony, Thanks for your explanation, and for highlighting the problems associated with moral arbitration. I can see what you're trying to say. However, I think you slightly misunderstood my email, I wrote:
> I can think of the following problematic areas: I was not suggesting that all of the things I listed are immoral in some absolute sense of the word. I was suggesting that they may be problematic for us a project. Unfortunately, outgoing project links can be seen as endorsements, and we must be careful about them in that respect. I think that the links and content on our website should aim to be family friendly and work safe, as vague as that may be. I wasn't proposing a set of hard and fast rules for determining what is or isn't safe by these standards. As a community, we would have to judge each one on a case by case basis. That's essentially what this thread was meant to be about. What does the community think? Is this link okay or not? -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
