On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gurd...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Paul Joseph Davis > <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Nov 17, 2009, at 2:24 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gurd...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gurd...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis >>>>> <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis >>>>>> <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gurd...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me if I'm >>>>>>>> wrong, and please advise. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If more logs are needed, let me know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you paste the output of running this from the CouchDB src >>>>>>> directory? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> $ prove -v test/etap/*.t >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul Davis >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, does ./utils/run work for you? >>>>> >>>>> Looks good: >>>>> >>>>> [vl...@kpax couchdb]$ pwd >>>>> /home/vladd/src/couchdb >>>>> [vl...@kpax couchdb]$ ./utils/run >>>>> Apache CouchDB 0.11.0b835834 (LogLevel=info) is starting. >>>>> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax. >>>>> [info] [<0.29.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/ >>>>> ^C >>>>> [vl...@kpax couchdb]$ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> After starting it with ./utils/run I've tried to run the "Test Suite" >>>>> from Futon and the only failing tests are oauth, replication, and >>>>> security_validation. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Paul Davis >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Vlad, >>>> >>>> $ ERL_FLAGS="-pa ./test/etap" prove -v test/etap/*.t >>> >>> This still seems to fail some tests: http://pastie.org/702238. >>> >>> I even "svn update"-d a minute ago and retried ./bootstrap && >>> ./configure && make && make check, but it still has some failures: >>> http://pastie.org/702240. >>> >>> On my home 32-bit FC11, everything seems to be okay, I've checked last >>> night. :-/ I'm kinda tensed that it may be that is something I'm doing >>> wrong, or I'm missing something, or it's something wrong with my >>> 64-bit FC11?! What else should I check to make sure it's not the case >>> and I'm not wasting your time? >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> >>>> >>>> or >>>> >>>> $ ./test/etap/run >>>> >>>> In the updates to the build system I added a helper in the test >>>> directory to specify paths to files. If run doesn't exist, you >>>> probably need to do: >>>> >>>> $ ./bootstrap && ./configure && make >>>> >>>> To get the new build system updates. >>>> >>>> HTH, >>>> Paul Davis >>>> >> >> Much closer. Can you run those individually to get the verbose output. If >> you still have a patched run.tpl you should make it "prove -v" in your diff. >> >> Then it should just be: >> >> $ ./test/etap/run test/etap/11*.t > > OK, here it comes: http://pastie.org/702292 > >> >> You don't happen to have weird firewall rules that could prevent replication >> to 127.0.0.1 or anything right? That's about the only reason I can think of >> that would allow 070 to pass but not the 11x replication tests. > > Probably not: I'm using only localhost to access CouchDB, but for the > sake of this test I've shut down iptables. > >> Paul Davis >> >
Vlad, Hmm, do you happen to have a version of Mochiweb installed into your system library directory? Or perhaps an old version in $PREFIX/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib/? Paul
