Gabor, no hurt feelings, there's always a first time :)
Thanks for your enthusiasm. I hope we could channel it into the right directions. Looking forward to your future contributions :) Cheers Jan -- On 17 May 2011, at 17:25, Gabor Ratky wrote: > Please fully ignore the email I sent below. As others have pointed out here > and on #couchdb, the email has gotten the following things wrong: > I am not meant to test the release artifacts with the release artifact > prepared for voting. > The release artifacts should be built from source using the tarball provided. > The purpose of voting is to perform 'make check' and run JS tests in the > browser (FF3 suggested in this case) > The version is correctly stated by `couchdb -V` built from the release > artifacts > > the minor detail I got right: > CouchDB 1.1.0 can read 1.0.2 databases > CouchDB built from the SVN 1.1.0 tag reports 1.2.0a-, opposed to 1.1.0 > > My only excuse is my excitement of the 1.1.0 release moving forward and > rushing to 'help' fellow CouchDB enthusiasts. > > > Let the voting continue (while I leave the stage). > > Gabor > On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Gabor Ratky wrote: > Those who develop on Mac OS X and have installed CouchDB using Homebrew [1], > should do the following to test CouchDB 1.1.0 with their applications: >> >> >> > > redracted to prevent further embarassment >> On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Robert Newson wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 1. >>> >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >>> artifacts so >>> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. >>> Everyone is >>> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >>> >>> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ >>> >>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 >>> >>> Happy voting, >>> >>> -- >>> Robert Newson >>> >>