On 29 Jun 2011, at 21:32, Randall Leeds wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:53, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirk...@ochtman.nl> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 18:46, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Except if people have trouble installing / upgrading CouchDB, it leaves >>> a bad taste. I'd rather not put users between a rock (1.7-based >>> SpiderMonkey version) and a hard place (CouchDB only supporting 1.8.5 >>> and up) >> >> Right. Also, if 1.2 takes a long time in coming (like some of the >> previous releases), it would be nice if we'd get to use the state of >> the art in JS sooner. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dirkjan >> > > I'm going to go forward with the following plan: > 1) Make trunk compatible with SpiderMonkey 1.7 again. > 2) Leave 1.1.x alone.* > > Let me know if this presents to anyone as egregiously offensive. > > * I'm sorry if this annoys anyone, but I don't want to backport > something that isn't a bug fix. That's just how it's going to be. 50% > policy, 50% time.
This sounds like a good plan to me. 1.2 shouldn't™ be taking forever. Cheers Jan --
