On 6 Oct 2011, at 10:42, Robert Newson wrote: > While I agree on the sentiment, I don't think it's part of the > decision. Even if 1.2 is months away, I don't think we can introduce > such a break in a minor point release.
Let's not be afraid to use 2.x if we need to. Ultimately, these numbers are
meant to communicate useful information. The marketing aspect of them ("Ooh,
CouchDB hit 2.0!") is a, usually, pleasant side-effect.
