On Oct 6, 2011, at 10:30 , Robert Newson wrote: > There is no build of 1.1.1 on Ubuntu 11.x that will work as well as > 1.1.0, so I think it's correct that it cannot build under those > conditions. > > Let's get 1.1.1 out, with the many useful bug fixes and tweaks, and > then focus on getting 1.2 out with 1.8.5 support (and "BREAKING > CHANGES"). > > I vote +1 to removing 1.8.5 support and the paren hack from 1.1.x.
+1 Cheers Jan -- > > B. > > On 6 October 2011 09:25, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> Paul Davis has researched the issue and it seems intractable. >>> >>> I would like to remove 1.8.5 support from 1.1.1. It was not present in >>> 1.1.0 so will not be (officially) missed. >>> >>> The place for a breaking change of this magnitude is 1.2, not a minor >>> bug fix release. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> B. >>> >> >> +1 on removing the paren hack for sure. >> >> Not sure about removing 1.8.5 support completely. On the one hand, it >> would prevent breakage because people couldn't link against the >> breaking SM. On the other hand, it prevents people from linking >> against 1.8.5 which means it won't build on Ubuntu 11.x. >> >> Unless someone comes up with a magic option I'd say put it to an >> informal vote so that I can blame someone else. >> >>> On 5 October 2011 18:25, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Yes, its release blocking. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> All, >>>>> >>>>> I went through JIRA and updated CHANGES and NEWS on origin/1.1.x to >>>>> include everything that was missing (Sidenote: Can we all keep this >>>>> file up to date when commit bugfixes or add features?). I'd appreciate >>>>> everyone giving it a look over before I start to build the release >>>>> artifact. >>>>> >>>>> I believe there's an outstanding issue (not present in JIRA) around >>>>> javascript function evaluation? Can someone confirm that it's release >>>>> blocking? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> B. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
