On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:05, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote:
> That ignores the number of releases performed prior to the creation of > that page. The release tarball contains the right stuff. Since the > process is not fully automated and has never been fully documented, I > don't think your -1 is fair. > Agreed. But no matter. > > However, it seems the recent addition of help to couchjs is broken on > Windows, which is release blocking, so, once it's confirmed, round 2 > ends in failure too. > Confirmed. Windows doesn't have a basename() function. I apologize for jumping to the conclusion that it would. My man page for basename says that it conforms to POSIX.1-2001 and I incorrectly believed this would be portable to Windows. It appears that _splitpath_s is probably the function to use on Windows: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8e46eyt7.aspx Can anyone confirm that the current code works for BSD? Benoitc reported no problems with FreeBSD and successful compilation on MacOS Lion. -Randall > > B. > > > On 21 October 2011 17:56, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote: > > Just to clarify, I reached this conclusion after seeing: > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_procedure?action=diff&rev1=66&rev2=67 > > > > It occurred to me that we're attempting to release without documenting > what > > we're doing first. The documentation above is incomplete. Our official > > release procedure is still based in Subversion commands. I think we need > to > > pin this down officially before proceeding. > > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> > wrote: > > > >> Actually, I think I'm going to give this a -1 without testing it. > >> > >> We still haven't ratified how releases are meant to work with Git, so I > >> don't see that we can make a release at the present time. We need to > agree > >> on how we're going to do this, and document it in both the release > procedure > >> and test procedure before we can proceed. > >> > >> Unless someone else has a very good reason why this doesn't matter? > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Paul Davis < > paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Can someone provide assistance on the new Test procedure please: > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201110.mbox/%3CCA+Y+447FXqVGx8ow=ewqm86cn9epb1cnbmvhk9ku4ogujby...@mail.gmail.com%3E > >>> > > >>> > I am not sure how best to update the workflow for Git. > >>> > > >>> > >>> git clone http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb.git && git > >>> checkout X.Y.Z > >>> > >>> The more I think about it, the more I think the requirement to not > >>> require a local checkout is silly. You're still requiring a copy of > >>> the VCS locally. Just because Git can make it a super awesome local > >>> copy of the entire repo seems like something we shouldn't penalize it > >>> for. > >>> > >>> Granted, Noah usually has a reasoning, so maybe I'm missing something > >>> else? > >>> > >>> > This is important. *waves hands* > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> This is the second release vote for Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 > >>> >> > >>> >> Changes since round 1; > >>> >> > >>> >> * Fix object sealing with SpiderMonkey 1.7.0 > >>> >> * Update CHANGES/NEWS to reflect COUCHDB-1129 > >>> >> * Fix JavaScript CLI test runner > >>> >> > >>> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > >>> >> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the > >>> release > >>> >> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report > your > >>> >> results and vote to this thread. > >>> >> > >>> >> We are voting on the following release artifacts: > >>> >> > >>> >> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.1/ > >>> >> > >>> >> Instructions for validating the release tarball can be found here: > >>> >> > >>> >> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/ > >>> >> > >>> >> Instructions for testing the build artefacts can be found here: > >>> >> > >>> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure > >>> >> > >>> >> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.1 tag in Git: > >>> >> > >>> >> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz > >>> >> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz.md5 > >>> >> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz.asc > >>> >> apache-couchdb-1.1.1.tar.gz.sha > >>> >> > >>> >> Test ALL the things. > >>> >> > >>> >> B. > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > > >
