On 4 March 2012 00:49, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > I disagree. The old binary builds should be deleted by everyone. There is > absolutely no reason to keep them around. The source release test procedure > starts with a command to wipe your existing download and build directory. > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 3 March 2012 02:05, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Dave, >> > >> > Please leave the binaries in place, or remove them. I, myself, leave them >> > in place. I then replace them with for the next round. Please do not use >> > "rcX" anywhere in the release artefact name. It sends the wrong message. >> > >> > Thanks! >> >> Fixed by removing them from p.a.o. They are still available in >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/jeifcxpbtpo78ak/Snapshots/20120223/ for the >> desperate. >> >> Having two binary releases with the same name is even more confusing >> for people who have downloaded rejected builds. A better approach is >> needed. >> >> Cheers >> Dave
Wiki updated to reflect nslater's point. A+ Dave
