Yes, I was following the instructions on the wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Windows_Binary_Releases
-Andrew Hamilton Project Engineer www.facilityone.com On Feb 24, 2012, at 4:12 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Andrew, were you testing in Firefox in privacy mode with your caches clear? > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Andrew Hamilton > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Not sure if this the best way to show my error log, but I am attaching the >> test suite results from couch. >> >> -1 >> Windows 7 x64 >> Firefox 11.0 >> signature OK >> md5 & sha OK >> No malware >> End-user verification OK >> Futon tests failed: >> attachments >> attachment_paths >> config >> cookie_auth >> delayed_commits >> design_docs >> erlang views >> invalid_docids >> replicator_db >> view_errors >> >> -Andrew Hamilton >> Project Engineer >> www.facilityone.com >> >> >> >> >> >> On Feb 24, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like to call a vote on the following Windows binaries based on >>> the concurrent Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release artefacts. >>> >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these >>> release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the >>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck >> in! >>> >>> We are voting on the following two binaries for R14B04 and R15B: >>> >>> https://people.apache.org/~dch/dist/1.2.0/ >>> >>> These have been built using Microsoft SDK 7.1 from the following >>> tree-ish in git: >>> >>> 4cd60f3d1683a3445c3248f48ae064fb573db2a1 >>> >>> And include the following 3rd party code: >>> Erlang R14B04 or R15B >>> OpenSSL 0.9.8r >>> wxWidgets 2.8.12 >>> Mozilla JavaScript 1.8.5 >>> cURL 7.23.1 >>> ICU 4.6.1 >>> Inno setup 5.4.3 >>> >>> Please follow the test procedure before voting: >>> >>> https://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Windows_Binary_Releases >>> >>> A+ >>> Dave >> >> >>
