On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 14, 2012, Joan Touzet wrote: >> >> Thanks to everyone who participated in the CouchDB summit in Boston this >> week! In case you didn't know, the (25 pages!) of meeting minutes are >> available for review at http://s.apache.org/ndI . >> >> Here's where we need YOUR HELP. During the summit, the participants >> identified 38 key features we think are important for CouchDB's future. >> Please help us RANK these ideas by visiting our All Our Ideas page: >> >> http://www.allourideas.org/couchdb2012/ >> >> All Our Ideas is a free/open source solution for voting based on >> pairwise comparison - think Kittenwar - and is super easy to use. >> >> Please complete as many comparisons as you can; we'd like all the >> feedback we can get. We'd be thrilled if each of you did at least 100 >> comparisons. >> >> Thanks again for your help in determining the future of Apache CouchDB! >> >> -- >> Joan Touzet | [email protected] | wohali everywhere else > > > also not saying that thie kind of ranking proposed by this service is odd to > sy the less, > > benoît
To be more constructive, we should rather first put all the lines that were on the dashboard, describe them and sort them by their dependancies (some line depends on another). I can start doing that on the wiki, but I need an access I guess. Then eventually ask for votes, those i don't see how votes are relaled to developer interest. Never forget that at the end we are an opensource project depending on the developer will. Interest from other is still interesting but we should distinct backend needed changes from end user features. - benoît
