On Apr 14, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Bob Dionne
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I kind of agree, though I think voting is neat. I'd like to think most of 
>> these features are influenced by experiences with users in addition to 
>> internal refactoring concerns and so forth.
>> 
>> It might help for everyone to see the list of features (here's a cleaned up 
>> version I got from BobN) [1]. As Benoit suggests, we need to sort/categorize 
>> them first before attaching priorities.
>> 
>> One thing we might think of is the areas they might be grouped in, along the 
>> line of teams as Jan suggested at the summit.
> 
> We are actually all agree on the need to have focus points. I still
> strongly disagree with this idea of team.

I'm not a big fan of teams either, but willing to go along if enough folks 
think it can help make for more progress.


> But yes we should organize
> the things in different topics.
> 
>> 
>> I'm happy to maintain this list as we drill down into the specifics, 
>> summarize email threads, and IRC chats. Some of these, .eg. moving metadata 
>> out of the docs, could easily require a lot of detailed discussion as they 
>> hit many areas of the code, so we should flesh out the details.
>> 
> 
> I was thinking we could start a wiki and organize things in a table or
> so . Thoughts?
> 
> - benoƮt

Reply via email to