Hi Jan, > Can you specify what systems should use which versions, so we can label them > correctly on the website?
For Mac OS X 10.6.8 to 10.7.2: https://github.com/downloads/cloudnode/couchdbx-app/CouchDB%20Server-1.2.0.zip For Mac OS X 10.7.3 and later https://github.com/downloads/cloudnode/couchdbx-app/CouchDB%20Server-1.2.0-OS%20X%2010.7.3.zip @Benoit I prefer to use only the well known port 5984. I agree on using the sandboxing mode. I suggest to make the next version (when CouchDB 1.3 comes out) that way. I also agree on having the code in the CouchDB repo. Maybe someone with commit rights can do the checkin. The License is already Apache. - Hans On Jun 8, 2012, at 12:51 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:43 , Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Hans J Schroeder <h...@cloudno.de> wrote: >>>> Hi Ryan, >>>> >>>> Thanks for testing. For older OS X versions you should use the other >>>> build. It is the same, but built with XCode 4.2. Apple made some >>>> significant changes from 10.7.2 to 10.7.3. >>>> >>>> - Hans >>>> >>> >>> >>> So I tested the binary and noticed it was starting on the 5984 port. >>> >>> Which means it hanged there since I had already a version running. I >>> think it would be good that a free port should be used on startup >>> (what is done by rcouchx). Except that it looks too work on latest >>> osx Lion. I still need to test on the coming version and in >>> particularly test if it works when sandboxed mode is enforced which >>> the default in new version. >>> >>> Also I would feel better to have the code in the Couchdb repository. >>> Binaries linked on the download pages will be considered as official >>> and supported. And imo we should only consider something as official >>> and supported if it's in the official source under the same license >>> agreement. Like it is for the windows one. >> >> Benoit, all great points, we should definitely look into all those >> things. I also think these are not blocking for getting the current >> binaries on the website (given we can define which works on which >> systems, as per my last mail, and given we don't find more issues). >> >> Once we have more people using this, we can fix all the remaining >> issues. I hope you agree! :) >> >> Cheers >> Jan >> -- >> > Jan, > > Yeah sure no problem at all, and technical details can be solved on time. > > Although we may need to make sure everyone is ready and OK to put > the code in official sources and sign everything needed ? If you think > this is not a problem, then go :) > > - benoit
