Big +1 from me. One of the ideas I had recently was to run each test 1,000 times (or whatever) and calculate the probability of it failing. That should enable us to prioritise the most brittle tests.
But it seems like you have a much more radical idea in mind. +1 for being radical. On 29 May 2013 14:35, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like to start to rewrite all of our tests to make them really > relianle. > > The problems that I want to fix are the following: > > - try to remove most of the sleep w e have around > - remove JS tests when it's about testing the HTTP API. There are > actually no reason to test the HTTP API by faking a browser like we do > actually when we could test expected response against requests. The JS > tests should only be used eventually to test the the _change API or > CORS features, basically any browser features. But we are still doing > it wrong right now. > - Etap is not maintained anymore. I think we should move to eunit and > other standards things. > > > Thoughts? > > - benoit > -- NS
