+1 -Russell On Jun 2, 2013 3:43 AM, "Noah Slater" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Big +1 from me. > > One of the ideas I had recently was to run each test 1,000 times (or > whatever) and calculate the probability of it failing. That should enable > us to prioritise the most brittle tests. > > But it seems like you have a much more radical idea in mind. +1 for being > radical. > > > On 29 May 2013 14:35, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I would like to start to rewrite all of our tests to make them really > > relianle. > > > > The problems that I want to fix are the following: > > > > - try to remove most of the sleep w e have around > > - remove JS tests when it's about testing the HTTP API. There are > > actually no reason to test the HTTP API by faking a browser like we do > > actually when we could test expected response against requests. The JS > > tests should only be used eventually to test the the _change API or > > CORS features, basically any browser features. But we are still doing > > it wrong right now. > > - Etap is not maintained anymore. I think we should move to eunit and > > other standards things. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > - benoit > > > > > > -- > NS >
