On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: > We can do it that way. Or maybe it's easier to just fix it now. Which > license are we missing right now? I gave my agreement last day but could be > done in a more formal way until tomorrow if needed. Still the question is > interesting ;)
I think that necessitates another rc cycle. I don't mind so much cutting another candidate, but I wouldn't like to ask our community to run their tests again on a build candidate that's the same from a code point of view. I wouldn't mind short-circuiting the voting, but I'm guessing other people have problems with that.
