[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13834621#comment-13834621
]
Alexander Shorin commented on COUCHDB-1934:
-------------------------------------------
> Then only the first point say. I just wanted to add that on the long term
> having in our repo has only sense if someone is ready to maintain it.
Let me try than since I had already said the word and at least there is nobody
argued with it.
> Off topic, but if you find the time to describe how to use backbone to access
> couchdb in a blog post or something that would be really cool ;)
but even more better as documentation article - we have [special section for
fauxton](https://github.com/apache/couchdb/tree/master/share/doc/src/fauxton)
in the source tree (;
> jquery.couch status
> -------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-1934
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1934
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Alexander Shorin
>
> When [~nslater] had proposed to include [jquery.couch.js
> docs|http://daleharvey.github.io/jquery.couch.js-docs/symbols/] into official
> CouchDB one I recall old good time when we had discussed Futon.Next project.
> Suddenly, it was out of official mailing lists, so no references are
> available, but [~garren], [~dch], [~bigbluehat] and [~ryanramage] were there
> and our discussion was around jquery vs backbone vs pouchdb. Backbone won.
> Nowdays, we have Fauxton which doesn't used jquery.couch and based on
> Backbone. So it seems if we'll replace Futon with him this client library
> would be left orphan.
> So that's the question: what is the status of jquery.couch.js? Is it still
> actual and supported or going to be deprecated?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
