On 10 Dec 2013, at 13:54 , Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Andy Wenk <a...@nms.de> wrote: >> On 9 December 2013 13:09, Simon Metson <si...@cloudant.com> wrote: >> >>>> Yes, but the URL is `/_utils/fauxton/`, isn’t it? >>>> >>> >>> >>> It is indeed >>> >> >> Unfortunately I was not able to find the conversation we had. But I do >> remember that there has been the question, why we cannot have both URL's to >> access Fauxton: >> >> /_utils/fauxton >> /_utils/fauxton/ >> >> And I do remember, that there has been the info, that we can only use the >> second version - what is indeed annoying. If there are no problems with >> both (what I assume is what you are both saying), then we should create a >> Jira ticket and fix it. Or we wait till fauxton will become /_utils/ :) > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I see that CouchDB handles both /_utils > and /_utils/ only because of special case in http handler: > https://github.com/apache/couchdb/blob/master/src/couchdb/couch_httpd_misc_handlers.erl#L66 > While this issue isn't annoying, I think the better fix is to get > ready Fauxton and replace Futon with it instead of having yet another > redirect case in handler's code (: I assume that at least for the next release Fauxton will not be ready and we haven’t yet resolved how to actually do the transition (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1954) I strongly suggest we do in fact add another special clause to that function to support both /_utils/fauxton/ and /_utils/fauxton Best Jan --
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
