On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Andy Wenk <a...@nms.de> wrote: > On 19 February 2014 15:56, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Andy Wenk <a...@nms.de> wrote: >> > On 19 February 2014 15:25, Robert Samuel Newson <rnew...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Yes. It's misleading for folks that stumble on it. >> >> >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > >> >> On 19 Feb 2014, at 14:22, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Should we decommission our Review Board instance? >> >> >> well nobody really tried it ... >> >> There is apparently some possibilities to bind automatically the >> review to review board, but not sure if it's feasible on apache. Also >> not sure It's the right tool, I preferred gerrit because it is abel to >> handle automatically the PRs from github. >> >> It would be good to have the PR directly on apache. So people don't >> have to register to a privately held service just to review a code. >> Anyway. At first maybe people could really try the tool before taking >> any decision. I will try, myself when I am back in 2 weeks -if it's >> still there -. Waiting for my flight right now. >> >> - benoit > > > maybe the fact that nobody tried to us it is a sign, that it is (at least > for now) not the right tool for the job? The efforts to use github for > reviews has for me (at least for now) shown, that this could lead into the > right direction. > > Save travels :) > My concern is that it force people to go on a privately held service (and encouraging people to use it). Having notifications on the ml is awesome but not enough imo.
- benoit
