From: Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl(mailto:dirk...@ochtman.nl) Reply: dev@couchdb.apache.org dev@couchdb.apache.org(mailto:dev@couchdb.apache.org) Date: 14. Mai 2014 at 15:26:46 To: dev@couchdb.apache.org dev@couchdb.apache.org(mailto:dev@couchdb.apache.org) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.5
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Alexander Shorin wrote: > > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > >> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Robert Kowalski wrote: > >>> Test Summary Report > >>> ------------------- > >>> ../test/etap/075-auth-cache.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: > >>> 1) > >>> Failed test: 2 > >>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 19 tests but ran 2. > >>> Files=51, Tests=1198, 284 wallclock secs ( 0.53 usr 0.11 sys + 94.30 cusr > >>> 23.84 csys = 118.78 CPU) > >>> Result: FAIL > >>> make[1]: *** [check] Error 1 > >>> make: *** [distcheck] Error 1 > >> > >> Ugh. Do we have any ideas about this? > > > > Probably, another floating test failure, but I couldn't reproduce it > > no matter how I tried. > > So are we going to say this is a fluke and we'll leave it for now? > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan From a procedural point of view, I’m OK with this, viz http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_Procedure > A successful vote needs a majority approval and at least three +1 binding > votes. > A binding vote is a vote cast by a member of the PMC. We have these so far. > Release may not be vetoed, but any -1 votes should be taken seriously. And none of those. If this issue was repeatable then one could open a JIRA and tag it for the next release. > The release manager has the power to abort a vote at any point and for any > reason. So the metaphorical tennis ball is in your metaphorical court. Use your magic sceptre wisely! — Dave Cottlehuber d...@jsonified.com Sent from my Couch
